Post by Melissa on Jan 31, 2011 18:13:22 GMT -5
Evidence presented at March 24th, 2009 preliminary hearing:
- State trooper testified that the 20-gauge gun smelled as though it had been freshly fired
- The shotgun blast to the back of Kenzie's head was said to be consistent with one made by a 20-gauge shotgun
- A small amount of gunshot residue was found on Jordan's shirt.
Acker pointed out the lab report states the residue could have gotten on the clothes by being in close proximity with a recently fired gun or by being in contact with a surface that was contaminated with residue. Guns at the house were used for hunting and target practice, they said.
Acker also said the pants the lab tested were not the pants the boy had on at school that day — he’d changed later at his grandmother’s house. Acker said that as soon as they realized that, they turned the right pair of pants over to the state police. Those pants have not been tested.
www.vindy.com/news/2009/mar/25/11-year-old-suspect-in-killing-can-stand-trial/?newswatch
- Kenzie's father Jack Houk testified that Jordan Brown was a "good shot", which only proves that Jordan has been shooting on multiple occassions and helps to explain the gunshot residue particles on his shirt.
Janessa's first two statements to police were that nothing unusual had happened. Prosecutors eventually said that she heard the sound of a gun go off before she and Jordan boarded the school bus.
Though no physical evidence clearly linked Jordan Brown to the murder of Kenzie Houk and her unborn son, District Magistrate David Rishel ordered Jordan to stand trial in adult court beginning May 1st, 2009.
D.A. John Bongivengo said that the gunshot residue on Jordan's clothes was the strongest evidence against him.
www.post-gazette.com/pg/09084/958103-455.stm
- State trooper testified that the 20-gauge gun smelled as though it had been freshly fired
- The shotgun blast to the back of Kenzie's head was said to be consistent with one made by a 20-gauge shotgun
- A small amount of gunshot residue was found on Jordan's shirt.
Acker pointed out the lab report states the residue could have gotten on the clothes by being in close proximity with a recently fired gun or by being in contact with a surface that was contaminated with residue. Guns at the house were used for hunting and target practice, they said.
Acker also said the pants the lab tested were not the pants the boy had on at school that day — he’d changed later at his grandmother’s house. Acker said that as soon as they realized that, they turned the right pair of pants over to the state police. Those pants have not been tested.
www.vindy.com/news/2009/mar/25/11-year-old-suspect-in-killing-can-stand-trial/?newswatch
- Kenzie's father Jack Houk testified that Jordan Brown was a "good shot", which only proves that Jordan has been shooting on multiple occassions and helps to explain the gunshot residue particles on his shirt.
Janessa's first two statements to police were that nothing unusual had happened. Prosecutors eventually said that she heard the sound of a gun go off before she and Jordan boarded the school bus.
Though no physical evidence clearly linked Jordan Brown to the murder of Kenzie Houk and her unborn son, District Magistrate David Rishel ordered Jordan to stand trial in adult court beginning May 1st, 2009.
D.A. John Bongivengo said that the gunshot residue on Jordan's clothes was the strongest evidence against him.
www.post-gazette.com/pg/09084/958103-455.stm