Post by abram on Feb 8, 2011 23:02:53 GMT -5
Debunking Police evidence;
1. Re gun residue - In rural areas, probably half the state, and everyone in Brown/Houk household would test positive, regardless, there were two particles of gun residue found (a minuscule amount).
2. Re shotgun shell – the yard most likely had many empty shells strewn about – the shotgun may not be the murder weapon.
3. Re retrieved pellets – only 26 pellets retrieved – 20 gauge bird-shot usually contains about 180 pellets – brings up the questions 'what was the ammo used and what was the murder weapon?
4. Testimony by Janessa – question of coercion, very young, she wasn't afraid to question Jordan, she wasn't afraid of him, why was it necessary to interrogate her three times.
From The New Castle News Online
“Their court filing states Janessa was present the entire time Jordan was at the home that morning. According to the attorneys, her original two statements to police indicated she noticed nothing unusual.”
And
“Yet they said that after Janessa went to live with her mother’s family, she provided a third statement to authorities. In it, the girl said she had heard a shotgun blast before she and Jordan had left the house to catch a school bus.”
Then
“Their motion notes she did not testify at Jordan’s preliminary hearing March 29. However she was at the courthouse that day, they said, where she was interviewed by “members of the district attorney’s office and possibly members of the Pennsylvania state police” prior to the hearing.”
Then
“The defense had requested disclosure of any statements Janessa had provided that day and in the days leading up to the hearing. But the district attorney’s office turned down the request on the grounds nothing Janessa has said had been put down in writing.”
Then
“Because original statements by Janessa had the effect of clearing Jordan, while it was only a later one that implicated him, the defense says it needs access to more recent information she may have offered to authorities.”
www.ncnewsonline.com/local/x546275917/Jordan-Browns-lawyers-seek-witness-statements
Conclusion - Janessa's third statement was at least, 'scripted, encouraged, rehearsed and practiced'. This may explain why Kenzie's mother is so eager to convict Jordan. Janessa's third statements were the basis for Jordan's arrest.
5. Footprints – According to weather data it snowed in Wampum at 6:47am, at 7:47am cloudy, at 8:47 am it snowed. The crime allegedly committed around 8am, left for school at 8:13am, snowed at 8:47, the tree trimmer came to the door at 10am and 911 response arrived at 10:15am, snow should have covered earlier tracks leaving the tree trimmer and 911 response to make tracks.
1. Re gun residue - In rural areas, probably half the state, and everyone in Brown/Houk household would test positive, regardless, there were two particles of gun residue found (a minuscule amount).
2. Re shotgun shell – the yard most likely had many empty shells strewn about – the shotgun may not be the murder weapon.
3. Re retrieved pellets – only 26 pellets retrieved – 20 gauge bird-shot usually contains about 180 pellets – brings up the questions 'what was the ammo used and what was the murder weapon?
4. Testimony by Janessa – question of coercion, very young, she wasn't afraid to question Jordan, she wasn't afraid of him, why was it necessary to interrogate her three times.
From The New Castle News Online
“Their court filing states Janessa was present the entire time Jordan was at the home that morning. According to the attorneys, her original two statements to police indicated she noticed nothing unusual.”
And
“Yet they said that after Janessa went to live with her mother’s family, she provided a third statement to authorities. In it, the girl said she had heard a shotgun blast before she and Jordan had left the house to catch a school bus.”
Then
“Their motion notes she did not testify at Jordan’s preliminary hearing March 29. However she was at the courthouse that day, they said, where she was interviewed by “members of the district attorney’s office and possibly members of the Pennsylvania state police” prior to the hearing.”
Then
“The defense had requested disclosure of any statements Janessa had provided that day and in the days leading up to the hearing. But the district attorney’s office turned down the request on the grounds nothing Janessa has said had been put down in writing.”
Then
“Because original statements by Janessa had the effect of clearing Jordan, while it was only a later one that implicated him, the defense says it needs access to more recent information she may have offered to authorities.”
www.ncnewsonline.com/local/x546275917/Jordan-Browns-lawyers-seek-witness-statements
Conclusion - Janessa's third statement was at least, 'scripted, encouraged, rehearsed and practiced'. This may explain why Kenzie's mother is so eager to convict Jordan. Janessa's third statements were the basis for Jordan's arrest.
5. Footprints – According to weather data it snowed in Wampum at 6:47am, at 7:47am cloudy, at 8:47 am it snowed. The crime allegedly committed around 8am, left for school at 8:13am, snowed at 8:47, the tree trimmer came to the door at 10am and 911 response arrived at 10:15am, snow should have covered earlier tracks leaving the tree trimmer and 911 response to make tracks.