|
Post by Melissa on Feb 1, 2011 16:22:05 GMT -5
When a person is shot with a shotgun it results in what is forensically known as high velocity impact blood spatter. It is important to note that blood spatter travels in somewhat counter-intuitive directions. "Spatter from an entrance wound is referred to as back spatter; the blood droplets travel opposite to the direction of the projectile toward the weapon and the shooter" (Eckert, 1997, p. 186). This means that if someone places a shotgun up against another person and shoots them, blood with spatter back onto the person and the gun as a result of the force of the weapon. The size of the blood droplets are small and may look like this, as shown in Eckert's book on forensic sciences: Here is a description of high velocity blood spatter and its relevance in forensic investigations: Jordan Brown's clothing did not contain blood spatter. The shotgun obtained from his bedroom did not contain evidence of blood either. Blood spatter of some kind would be expected on at least the gun, but most likely the shooter as well, because it travels at least 3-to-4 feet. References: Eckert, W. G. (1997). Introduction to forensic sciences (2nd ed.). USA: Elsevier Science Publishing Company.
|
|
|
Post by graceness on Feb 1, 2011 20:11:41 GMT -5
|
|
abram
Junior Member
Posts: 61
|
Post by abram on Feb 4, 2011 15:25:22 GMT -5
Is there police or court documentation which states the absence of blood splatter?
|
|
|
Post by Melissa on Feb 4, 2011 15:34:06 GMT -5
If you review the court documents pertaining to Jordan posted on this site you will see that there is nothing in them referencing any type of blood on him, his clothes, or on the shotgun found in his room. If there had been blood they would have brought this up in the preliminary hearing. I have been told separately there was no blood. As far as blood spatter on the walls and in the location where she was actually shot...that I don't know. I don't know what the scene looked like at all.
|
|